To answer this question
two academic documents by Raphael Fischler and Richard E. Klosterman
were perscribed. Fischler outlines the main principles of planning and what
common confusions of the practice in his reading 'Fifty Thesis on Urban
Planning and Urban Planners'. In Klosterman's article; 'Arguments For and
Against Planning', he outlines why planning is necessary and identifies common
arguments from the perspectives of different ideologies.
Fifty Thesis on Urban Planning
and Urban Planners - Fischler
Raphael Fischler's 'Fifty
Thesis on Urban Planning and Urban Planners' aim to develop a common
view towards the discipline and eliminate misconceptions about what planners
face and what is thought of the practice. Fischler begins by identifying the
differences between various views of planning and what planning is used for. It
is a common belief that planners are used for developing political power and
implementing social structure rather than focusing on community wellbeing and
improving urban life. The document then goes on to explain exactly what
planners are good for and what planning achieves, including a general aim of
solving the 'social, functional and aesthetic problems of the industrial city’.
Planning can be implemented in
a way of which emphasises community wants, values and diversity through
community consultation and involvement. Good urban planning is achieved when a
sense of community, relationships and involvement is produced through the urban
policies and design. If a town feels they have appropriate access to supplies,
their values are upheld, are in good health, are living in an enjoyable
environment, and most importantly feel involved in the decision making or urban
policies, then a good urban planning system is in effect.
The document also discusses the
education element of planning, as well as the qualities of urban planners that
are needed to create good urban systems. Planning is a multidisciplinary field
which means planners are required to have a large understanding of many
subjects involved in decision making. They need to be passionate and able to
communicate effectively to be able to coordinate and consolidate. They must be
able to persuade and explain ideas and reasons, but also be open to suggestions
and criticism. Urban planners are required to be creative and innovative to be
able to develop urban plans that are beneficial to urban life.
Arguments For and Against
Planning - Klosterman
Richard E. Klosterman outlines
main areas of arguments for and against urban and regional planning, which
explain why planning is necessary. The three areas which produce the greatest
arguments include the economic,pluralist and traditional and arguments.
Klosterman begins by discussing the economic perspective, where it is believed
it would impose financial and administrative burdens on the economy. Urban
planning is a public good, whereby it is provided to the public at no direct
cost. It provides benefits to the community including better social capital and
connectivity to commute and involve. However there are often externalities, or
'spill-over' effects. However these can be viewed as both due to urban planning
and due to avoiding planning. Congestion, traffic, pollution and lack
of greenspace are all problems urban planners seek to solve. However in solving
these problems there is often a need for detouring, noise and production costs.
Pluralist arguments begin with
who owns the power in planning. Planners are seen as political advocates, who
follow the policies and frameworks given to them. To avoid creating plans that
are do not just consist of government input, community involvement
and consultation is needed to involve those that are impacted in
the decision making. Urban planners should also be more involved in the
decision making at a political level so there is a greater outcome for future
communities.
In the traditional and Marxist
arguments there continues to be evidence of community involvement and the need
for current urban planning policies and practices to be used, which will in
turn better the urban life for the future. There is ultimately a
gap between planning's potential and performance, which can be closed
by analysing actions before implementation and involving all those who are
directly involved. It is also important for planners to be passionate, to be
certain and knowledgeable, this will close the gap and ensure they
are used to their potential rather than being overlooked.
- Rachelle Hardaker
No comments:
Post a Comment